|
FEDERATION OF STATES MIDDLE EAST ARTICLES Federation of States - June 18, 2002 - In answer to implied allegations by those not involved in the SIP nor the Federation of States in regards to certain criticisms perceived by them in a couple of articles published on the Federation of States Web page about the War on Terrorism, the following is a response. The Texas Southern Independence Party(SIPT) By Laws, Article X, Section 1. SIP Membership Requirements, paragraph b. states as shown below:
It appears that the present Zionist controlled government of Israel operates very much like a totalitarian Fascist government similar in many respects to the German government of the 1940s. For that reason, persons exhibiting strong leanings for such totalitarianism may find themselves 180 degrees out of sync with the beliefs of SIP confederates or the founding fathers and surprisingly even against the public stand of President Bush. But, the idea that the SIP would put forth a plank against any foreign nation not at war with our people is ludicrous and could possibly be designed by some to attempt to cause dissension within the ranks of the Federation of States and the Southern Independence Party. The Southern Independence Party does not support any totalitarian government including the United States when it behaves in such a manner as to deserve the label. By the way, why should ordinary gentiles be so concerned about defending anything Israel chooses to do? Could this be evidence of the results of substantial and prolonged propaganda aimed at mind control of the American public by foreign interests? It is, however, not in the interest of a restored Confederacy to try to tell other nations how to run their countries as the United States and the United Nations are presently attempting to do. The CSA shall mainly concern itself with its own people and its own internal problems and shall leave other nations' problems up to them unless they directly threaten the national security of the Confederate States of America or the freedom of its people. But, that would be foreign policy of a nation, and not a policy of a domestic political party. Having said this, neither the Southern Independence Party nor an envisioned restored Confederacy will look favorably upon other nations and/or their political parties attempting to control or shape Confederate public opinion and/or the official policy of the Confederate States of America. Other nations are expected to leave us alone and we will leave them alone. Laissez-faire* type government is the goal with a rather isolationist foreign policy similar to that of the Swedes and Swiss. We shall strive to Awalk softly, but carry a big stick; with the ideas of live and let live and don’t tread on us as the general foreign policy. As for the United States, they have chosen the low and destructive road to enslavement of mankind under a world wide empire headed by the United States. Were we now an independent nation called the Confederate States of America, we would not care what policy the United States wished to pursue as long as they left us alone to pursue our own policies, freedoms and prosperity. As to our articles on the Middle East, these were for the purpose of showing the errors being made by an obtrusive U.S. foreign policy, since we are still under illegal occupation by the United States and since the U.S. continually seeks to send our young men into harms way to further their often wrongful international interests. At least the U. S. has stayed out of the Northern Ireland conflict, so far. The Southern Independence Party did support the war against the Taliban government of Afghanistan due to its attack against the North American continent where we live. But, our founding fathers warned us to avoid foreign entanglements. Yet those seeking to further the empire status of the United States did just 180 degrees opposite of those warnings. Just to allay possible suspicions against the leadership involved in the Federation of States and the Southern Independence Party, we wish to let the readers know that we are aware of the substantial Jewish involvement in supporting the Confederacy in 1861 where around 10,000 Jewish men were involved in the Confederate Armed forces. We also would point out that Judah Benjamin was appointed as the First Attorney General of the Confederacy, then appointed as Secretary of War and finally as Secretary of State in President Jefferson Davis’s cabinet. Secretary Judah P. Benjamin was Jewish.
*lais•Asez-faire, noun, Fr. laissez faire, imperative of laisser faire to let (people) do (as they choose)John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) originally wrote the Principles of Political Economy, with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy advocating Laisser-faire as the desired practice of government. 1. : a doctrine opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond the minimum necessary for the maintenance of peace and property rights 2. : a philosophy or practice characterized by a usually deliberate abstention from direction or interference especially with individual freedom of choice and action.
|